Telecheck Code 3: denying checks despite sufficient funds? (2024)

Table of Contents
Not normal Telecheck responds

If you’re a modern merchant worried about being defrauded by bad-check writers or identity thieves – in other words, “if you’re a modern merchant” – you can get help from check-verification companies, which can reduce (though not eliminate) the chances you’ll sell to a customer whoses check is no good.

Problem is, if you’re an honest customer seeking to do business with one of these merchants, there’s always the chance one of the merchant-protection services will incorrectly judge you a fraud risk, in addition to the standard risks of computer glitches, database breaches and other problems that can vex anybody in today’s computerized economy.

We mention this because ofcomplaints from readers who’ve had bad experiences trying to buy from merchants who subscribe to Telecheck; the complaints boil down to, “I tried to pay by check and Telecheck declined it, even though I had more than sufficient funds in my account.”

Larry from Illinois told us on Dec. 17: “We were denied a check at Walgreens (where we have an account) due to TeleCheck's profile. We went to the bank and they called TeleCheck to tell them we had plenty of money in our account. TeleCheck said it didn't matter how much money we had in the bank, their statistical profile found something else. The something else was that we don't write many checks (true) and we were trying to write two in one day. The fact that the bank said there was money in the bank meant nothing to them. They said we shouldn't write checks for seven days (it's Christmas season!).”

Not normal

The previous week, Mary from California said “I went to the local Burlington Coat Factory to get a few stocking stuffers that totaled $33.65. When the clerk ran my check through, it was declined by TeleCheck, without an explanation. ... I have never written a bad check in my life and knew I had more than enough funds ($4,500+) in my checking account, so I asked the clerk to run it again, but it was again declined. You cannot imagine my embarrassment as the other shoppers standing in line stared at me, probably thinking the worst of me!

“I went home and immediately called the number on the declined receipt. … The reason given to me for the denial was that Burlington is not in my "normal" shopping pattern, so there was not a recent record of me writing a check there. TeleCheck declined my check to protect the merchant against possible fraud.”

That’s a genuine problem: on the one hand, when a checking account, credit card or similar financial instrument actually is stolen, “increased activity, especially in new places the account holder’s never visited before” is one of the biggest red flags anti-fraud people know to look for.

On the other hand, “increased activity, even in places the account holder’s never been before” can also mean “It’s December, when people go shopping more than usual because they have to buy gifts.”

We read Telecheck’s FAQ page in hope of determining why people like Larry and Mary had their purchases declined, and found this:

You have more than enough money in your account to cover the check. Why did you get a Code 3?

In most cases, TeleCheck did not perform a funds check on your account at the point-of-sale, and your account balance was not weighed into its risk decisioning. The transaction carried risk indicators independent of bank balance.

You've never written a bad check or do [not] write them very often. Why did you get a Code 3?

Evidence of prior bad check writing history is not determinative in how a risk model ultimately decisions on a check transaction. The transaction carried other risk indicators.

Also, when your transaction was analyzed, it probably had several characteristics that made it look risky. In fact, if the account number was rarely, or never seen by TeleCheck before, this in itself could be a factor in a decision to decline.

TeleCheck might decline checks it’s never seen before? So you can't write checks if you've never written checks? Sounds like a Catch-22 — and indeed, that’s exactly what Robert from Vermont complained about in November:

Telecheck Code 3: denying checks despite sufficient funds? (2)

“At Walmart I attempted to buy an iPhone priced at over $500. I wrote the check for the purchase and TeleCheck declined the check. Calling TeleCheck was futile as they said I must develop a history with them. So here is what I learned from this experience. If you have shopped for years at a particular store successfully and they suddenly decide to use Telecheck's services they will decline your check that they consider 'high risk' because you have not established a history with them. This is circular reasoning which, somehow, makes sense to them. You cannot establish a history if they decline your transactions! … The account in question has thousands of dollars in it which, apparently, makes no difference to TeleCheck. Also, when I called them they requested driver's license number, SSN, date of birth, address, telephone number, checking account number, date of transaction, amount of the transaction and from that point on, I was stonewalled with incredibly stupid excuses and reasoning!

“My advice is to complain to store managers that they will continue to lose sales because of a service they are using to prevent losses from bad checks and that same service is preventing sales by those with good checks and plenty of money in their accounts. To sum it all up, TeleCheck sucks badly and there is no avenue of recourse on their site or via phone.”

We must admit: when we tried making sense of the answers on the FAQ page, it did sound as though TeleCheck were saying “If we reject your check despite sufficient funds, we can't tell you why but trust us: it was for a good reason.”

So: if a customer makes a good-faith attempt to cash a check, has sufficient funds and is denied anyway -- what recourse, if any, does that customer have? If you don't write checks very often, and have never written a check at a particular store before, should you simply expect difficulty when trying to shop with TeleCheck merchants?

Telecheck responds

We emailed TeleCheck to ask such questions, and got a prompt response from communications director Cara Crifasi:

In general, the Code 3 is a risk decline that is generated per transaction and is based on but not limited to the consumer’s check writing history, check writing activity, dollar amount and the parameters that TeleCheck has in place with the specific merchant. Unfortunately, the initial generation of the Code 3 is not related to how much money a person has in his or her account.

There is no way to provide a general answer in response to a Code 3 because that will differ from check writer to check writer. If a check writer’s check is declined at a TeleCheck merchant , they can call Customer Service @800-366-2425 to speak with a Representative regarding the check decline.

Here is a little moreinsight to consumers regarding the uses of the Code 3 as well:

The changing marketplace has brought new challenges to merchants, particularly in the area of payment risk. Greater losses from identity theft and fraud require heightened vigilance in the review and acceptance of payment transactions. TeleCheck’s services help merchants control fraud-related losses, and controlled loss translates into better pricing and payment options for consumers.

In other words: they can't tell you why your check was declined, but it was for a good reason.

By

Telecheck Code 3: denying checks despite sufficient funds? (2024)
Top Articles
Evil Recap: The Otherworldly Hits Keep On Comin’
The Casting Of Frank Stone Could Be The Next Until Dawn
Melfme
Craigslist Dog Sitter
Pbr Wisconsin Baseball
R Tiktoksweets
Bc Hyundai Tupelo Ms
3472542504
United Dual Complete Providers
Cooking Fever Wiki
I Wanna Dance with Somebody : séances à Paris et en Île-de-France - L'Officiel des spectacles
Sivir Urf Runes
Available Training - Acadis® Portal
Nashville Predators Wiki
Craigslist Portland Oregon Motorcycles
Ibukunore
Espn Horse Racing Results
Craigslist St. Cloud Minnesota
Betaalbaar naar The Big Apple: 9 x tips voor New York City
R&S Auto Lockridge Iowa
Guinness World Record For Longest Imessage
Our 10 Best Selfcleaningcatlitterbox in the US - September 2024
Little Einsteins Transcript
Sony Wf-1000Xm4 Controls
Rugged Gentleman Barber Shop Martinsburg Wv
Primerica Shareholder Account
How Much Is An Alignment At Costco
Craigs List Tallahassee
Renfield Showtimes Near Marquee Cinemas - Wakefield 12
Life Insurance Policies | New York Life
The value of R in SI units is _____?
How To Make Infinity On Calculator
Nextdoor Myvidster
Six Flags Employee Pay Stubs
Lowell Car Accident Lawyer Kiley Law Group
Edward Walk In Clinic Plainfield Il
Synchrony Manage Account
Bernie Platt, former Cherry Hill mayor and funeral home magnate, has died at 90
Oriellys Tooele
Bartow Qpublic
The best bagels in NYC, according to a New Yorker
Giovanna Ewbank Nua
Levi Ackerman Tattoo Ideas
Craigslist Houses For Rent Little River Sc
Stephen Dilbeck, The First Hicks Baby: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Craigslist Charles Town West Virginia
Blog Pch
What Time Do Papa John's Pizza Close
The Goshen News Obituary
Myhrkohls.con
Ark Silica Pearls Gfi
login.microsoftonline.com Reviews | scam or legit check
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ray Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 6123

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (49 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ray Christiansen

Birthday: 1998-05-04

Address: Apt. 814 34339 Sauer Islands, Hirtheville, GA 02446-8771

Phone: +337636892828

Job: Lead Hospitality Designer

Hobby: Urban exploration, Tai chi, Lockpicking, Fashion, Gunsmithing, Pottery, Geocaching

Introduction: My name is Ray Christiansen, I am a fair, good, cute, gentle, vast, glamorous, excited person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.